Independence day was about a week back. the flag was hoisted in reverence, as most wore their Indian finery. speeches were held about heroic tasks performed 61 years ago and we were reminded how as a generation we are uncaring and inapt. less than an hour later, i was sprawled on my bed in jeans and a t-shirt watching 'the simpsons', and i couldn't help thinking whether i should be feeling guilty about my clearly inconsiderate lack of patriotism. and that got me thinking about the whole concept of patriotism. the more i thought about it, the more absurd it seemed to me. does any one have only one place they adore? if you haven't travelled then probably, but for those of us who have gotten around, its practically impossible. but patriotism decates that you must be loyal to only one place. it doesn't leave room for the resonable possibility that its citizen may prefer another locale equally, or heck, even more. why must anyone be required to be reverant to an area just because they were born there?
before you start sending me hate mail, let me explain my self. i think patriotism is an excellent way of uniting people of varied backgrounds. i just think that patriotism, as it is being defined today, is horribly misleading and can be quite dangerous. my primary issue with patriotism is the boundary it imposes. not only should no one be required to be loyal to certain man-made demarcations, they shouldn't want to be either. as a person entering the 21st century, poised at the brink of an exponentional globalisation, it seems ridiculous to be going backwards and putting up boundaries just as they are being distroyed. my (other!) primary concern with national patriotism is that it creates divides among land and hence among people. the concept of 'mine' and 'yours' is no longer abstract. it can be quantified. this has lead to, and will continue to lead to regional conflicts in many forms.
my solution, as unreal as it is, is simple. replace national patiotism with global patriotism. let people be loyal not only to their place of birth or origin but also to everyother nook and cranny of this planet. no one wants to harm whats theirs. no one would want to wage wars, whether economic or political, on their own land! no one would want to dump their radio active waste in their own land. no one would want to lead a part of their own land into accepting unreasonable loans. thats absurd! and that is what we should try to achieve.
(the counter argument to what i just said would be that people are inherently twisted, and that in reality no one thinks twice even when comminting atrocities on their own. also global patriotism is extremely 'large' - if you know what i mean- and that fragementation is inevitable. ALSO that if we did achieve global patriotism, people would still need someone to unload their radioactive waste onto and there is a good chance that this might be along racial lines. but like i said, i never claimed for my solution to be the one. what i do know however, is that national patriotism is getting us no where, so why not give this a shot?)
Saturday, August 23, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

5 comments:
wooo
iv read alotta posts of the meaning of Independence n stuff but this was by far the most unlike any other.
well 'the solution', was really great n if we actually implement it, i could 'actually' resolve the problems the world is facing today but on the flip side human beings r territorial as they say 'its in our genes' we just cant do without them
but yes its up to us to dissolve the boundaries
btw by any chance ru in ruia
Spellings Adu!
Spellings!
Sorry, but i can't help it.
aditi, trust me, my solution is far from possible... 'territorial'.. thats precisely the word i was looking for.. but we like i keep saying, identifying the problem is a large step, but people tend to be complacent about the fact that once they identify their own flaw somehow the justifies not correcting it... which is a whole load of BS... im saying we need to pro actively change... i tried to incld the recent kasmiri crisis, but i thot this was controversial enuff! and i am in ruia... i asked prabha if she knew you n she pointed you out... im in protocol
varu, is that you?? yeda? i used spell check! and i cant seem to access your profile.. change your settings.. unless you dont want to ie!
Well write abt the kashmir issue
really just write
controversial or not, dont think abt that, its ur blog dont think abt others wn u write thats all ill say
the current outlook issue has an article by arundhati roy' azaadi for kashmir, azadi for India'
read that
infact i am elated to hear that ppl at ruia r actually politically inclined n think abt all this :P
i read ur reply today so now i know who u are fine next time ill drop in to say hi.
n do u happen to know Nachiket n Anshul, v can actually have a good discussion over this topic.
cz u bring an altogether new perspective to the entire issue
looking forward to it
peace
nice post Aney! but only for the mere advantage of a profit driven capitalist who dreams of free markets and less government control one can't ignore the importance of existing nation states. And if not for Capitalism, nobody ever would have thought of colonization to increase their territorial boundaries. :P
Post a Comment